Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-belyavskiy-rfc5933-bis

[Olafur Gudmundsson]

> On Jun 18, 2020, at 11:30 AM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
> 
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky <beld...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The 2nd registry
>> Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Record (RR) Type Digest Algorithms
>> (https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml#ds-rr-types-1
>>  
>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml#ds-rr-types-1>)
>> has the "Standards Action" update policy
> 
> I had forgotten that the DS registry is "standards action". This document 
> shows why that was a bad idea.

Why ? 

> 
> It might be better, and faster, for this WG to adopt a one-paragraph draft 
> that makes the DS registry "RFC required", like the other DNSSEC-related 
> registries.
You are proposing a bureaucratic solution without thinking about the 
operational implications of it. 
The hardest part to update in DNS tree right now is uploading DS records to the 
parents, keeping the list of algorithms down helps avoid operational problems 

Olafur


_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop