Peace,

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 8:31 PM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote:
> My reasoning is that (as above) these algorithms are generally of
> low interest and that requiring community review for code point
> registration has the result of consuming quite scarce resources
> in the service of making the algorithms which are being registered
> marginally clearer.

I sort of agree but I can't help wondering if the IETF would then
manage to process the flow of technical erratas, corrections and -bis
documents, which the current community review process is aiming to
avoid.

--
Töma

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to