Peace, On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 8:31 PM Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > My reasoning is that (as above) these algorithms are generally of > low interest and that requiring community review for code point > registration has the result of consuming quite scarce resources > in the service of making the algorithms which are being registered > marginally clearer.
I sort of agree but I can't help wondering if the IETF would then manage to process the flow of technical erratas, corrections and -bis documents, which the current community review process is aiming to avoid. -- Töma _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop