On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:47 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Eric
>
> One of the reasons we've published 8624 was to offer usage recommendations,
> and especially this table:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8624#page-5
>
> I believe I saw that one of the authors mentioned earlier they are looking
> to
> do a -bis update, to update this table.
>

Thanks for the pointer. And I suppose I could live with an Informational
RFC with a  NOT RECOMMENDED entry in this table.

-Ekr
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to