On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:47 AM Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Eric > > One of the reasons we've published 8624 was to offer usage recommendations, > and especially this table: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8624#page-5 > > I believe I saw that one of the authors mentioned earlier they are looking > to > do a -bis update, to update this table. > Thanks for the pointer. And I suppose I could live with an Informational RFC with a NOT RECOMMENDED entry in this table. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop