All On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:52 AM Ondřej Surý <ond...@isc.org> wrote:
> [...] > > I would also ask the WG to require a implementation report before we send > this to WGLC. As chair, this statement - I can not stress this strongly enough - determines even the consideration of a Working Group Last Call. (I would argue my position on this is stronger than Olafur's). As chair, I'm very open to having the WG consider and possibly adopt, technical work such as this. I have a *lower* bar for adopting than my co-chairs or our Area Director. As chair, I purposely don't state the intended RFC track during the call for adoption. While I disagree with the authors in a percentage of adopted work, I feel the WG is very effective at providing guidance, and reasoning. The chairs listen and consider these comments. As chair, we have a very *high* bar for moving to WGLC. Implementation reports are everything to myself (not speaking for my co-chairs, but I believe they have similar feelings). I had been thinking about the outcome of this call for adoption, and was going to have a conversation with my co-chairs and Warren on my thoughts in the next few days. Hearing these thoughts are very useful, and I can't thank you enough.. tim
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
