On Jul 25, 2019, at 19:14, Tommy Jensen < Jensen.Thomas=40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I still maintain that having descriptive terms should be preferable over an abundance of abbreviations, particular in documents. In this case, why not "classic DNS" or "traditional DNS"? Likewise, "encrypted DNS" instead of DoTH. I agree with "encrypted DNS" because that makes the meaning (DoH or DoT or X : X is some new way to encrypt DNS) clear when it is intended Like DNSCrypt with UDP transport? Or like an apex TXT record that contains a one-time token to authenticate a zone to a service? I spent some time this week at the Africa DNS Forum in Botswana promoting the idea that the concept of "DNS Security" is usefully more broad than just DNSSEC. Perhaps we need a corresponding effort to broaden "DNS Encryption" beyond DoH and DoT? Joe
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
