<humor>
As long as we avoid 53Cr.
(One of the isotopes of chromium happens to have atomic mass of 53 - funny
coincidence, what with chrome/chromium being google things.)
(Particularly if it is hexavalent.)
</humor>
Brian

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 1:34 PM Tommy Jensen <Jensen.Thomas=
40microsoft....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> The 53U, 53T, 53UT ordering makes more sense to me, since it aligns with
> the DoH/DoT alignment of protocol indicator followed by transport indicator
> ordering.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* DNSOP <dnsop-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Paul Wouters <
> p...@nohats.ca>
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 25, 2019 10:29 AM
> *To:* Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org>
> *Cc:* dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action:
> draft-hoffman-dns-terminology-ter-01.txt
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Evan Hunt wrote:
>
> > "Do53" is a handy abbreviation, but I'm concerned that using it as a
> > coequal peer of DoT and DoH will lead to fuzzy thinking.
>
> Indeed. U53, T53 and UT53 (or 53U, 53T, 53UT) would be far more
> informative..
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
>
> https://nam06..safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdnsop&amp;data=02%7C01%7CJensen.Thomas%40microsoft.com%7Ca83a347f25ef461c263708d71125b5a6%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636996725966251868&amp;sdata=l29PLDfowCk0761lJXtpG4%2FZEvgf8nSkmKWLZ8HxcFE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdnsop&amp;data=02%7C01%7CJensen.Thomas%40microsoft.com%7Ca83a347f25ef461c263708d71125b5a6%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636996725966251868&amp;sdata=l29PLDfowCk0761lJXtpG4%2FZEvgf8nSkmKWLZ8HxcFE%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to