Hi Tony, what do you use then for "traditional DNS over UDP/TCP” aka Do53
I had thought about one approach is to express distinction into the abbreviation by transport protocol, a suggestion by Puneet Sood was to use DoUT instead of Do53 This would still be consistent with grouping DoT and DoH into in DoTH. BR, Normen > On 25. Jul 2019, at 12:54, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote: >> >> Seen on a slide at IETF 105 : >> >> DoTH (to talk about DoH and DoT together, as in "DoTH use TLS to >> protect DNS queries against snoopers"). >> >> A nice addition? :-) > > DoTH is the abbreviation I use for my documentation about encrypted DNS > since August last year, https://www.dns.cam.ac.uk/servers/doth.html > > Tony. > -- > f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ > Wight: Variable 2 to 4, becoming cyclonic 5 to 7 for a time. Smooth or slight > becoming slight or moderate. Squally thundery showers. Good, occasionally > poor. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
