Paul Hoffman wrote: > Do53 was invented as a way of saying "DNS format and transport as > described in RFC 1034 and RFC 1035, with updates". If anyone has a > better shorthand for that than "Do53", that's great. I believe a > shorthand is needed, particularly for publications that are > discussiong multiple transports.
I still maintain that having descriptive terms should be preferable over an abundance of abbreviations, particular in documents. In this case, why not "classic DNS" or "traditional DNS"? Likewise, "encrypted DNS" instead of DoTH. Kind regards, Martin _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
