And the existing system is not consistently formatted, this would create
a parseable and consistent standard.

And would bypass GDPR concerns by registries.

On 7/10/19 3:14 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> Philip,
>
> On Jul 10, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Philip Homburg
> <pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com <mailto:pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com>> wrote:
>> With that in mind, it seems that this proposal doesn't address any
>> technical
>> issues with whois.
>
> Maybe rate limiting by most (all?) whois servers? 
>
> Regards,
> -drc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to