And the existing system is not consistently formatted, this would create a parseable and consistent standard.
And would bypass GDPR concerns by registries. On 7/10/19 3:14 PM, David Conrad wrote: > Philip, > > On Jul 10, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Philip Homburg > <pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com <mailto:pch-dnso...@u-1.phicoh.com>> wrote: >> With that in mind, it seems that this proposal doesn't address any >> technical >> issues with whois. > > Maybe rate limiting by most (all?) whois servers? > > Regards, > -drc > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
