I'll look at ETSI. But is the risk to self-identification as present when role-based accounts could be used as opposed to PII? I guess I'm not understanding the risks of people accidentally disclosing what they don't intend to.
On 7/9/19 11:27 AM, Vittorio Bertola wrote: >> Il 9 luglio 2019 16:36 John Bambenek >> <jcb=40bambenekconsulting....@dmarc.ietf.org> ha scritto: >> >>> I agree with pretty much everything else Jim said, but really this seems >>> like the core issue: this seems like a proposal in the wrong venue. >> If the proposal is to create a standard by which to put contact >> information into DNS records, what venue would you suggest? > You could try with ETSI... Seriously, the IETF in the past has already > decided not to standardize certain technologies, as they could easily have > been used to gain access to personal information and identify/track people on > a mass scale, even with the blessing of law enforcement authorities and with > the purpose of legitimate investigation activities. It would be weird now to > work on a mechanism that could easily be used to coerce people to > self-identify themselves in a global, public, automatically scrapable > database to facilitate similar investigations. > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
