-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

John Bambenek <jcb=40bambenekconsulting....@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:
> 
> But is the risk to self-identification as present when
> role-based accounts could be used as opposed to PII? I guess
> I'm not understanding the risks of people accidentally
> disclosing what they don't intend to.

The risk is this: until people have been burned by over-sharing
sensitive information, most are very ill informed about the fact
that sharing is risky at all.

People literally won't understand that listing their name and
phone number, to assert ownership of a domain, ALSO exposes that
data to any creative criminal who knows how to wield dig as part
of preparing their spear-phishing campaign (as a random example).
Or expose their current address to a vindictive ex.

Most people won't understand this until it's too late, until
they've been burned.

Many domain owners are barely technically literate, DNS is not
just used by medium and large organizations with dedicated IT
staff. Many domain owners do not have an "organizational role" to
list, even if that were the encouraged default option.

Understanding how your data puts you at risk requires both
thinking in an adversarial way, and requires understanding how
the technology works. Very few people have that combination of
skills, even within tech.

As a result, the only reasonable assumption is that any system
which encourages the collection (let alone the publication) of
personal data must be considered risky, even dangerous. We have
too many such systems as it is, we need to think very carefully
and need strong justification for creating more of them.

Another way to put it: if a system requires you think and
exercise care to stay safe, that means the system itself is by
default unsafe. Building unsafe systems is not good engineering
practice.

Cheers,
 - Bjarni

- -- 
Sent using Mailpile, Free Software from www.mailpile.is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=4QSR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to