Ted Lemon wrote:
On Apr 4, 2018, at 10:54 AM, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org
<mailto:p...@redbarn.org>> wrote:
this is not a service. DOH is a service. this is a proxy, which i
would like to have be interoperable. please don't ask me to change
what i want to build; that would be out-of-scope.
Maybe another question to ask is "okay, Paul wants to build this, but
why does the IETF need to standardize it?"
same as for ECS: not universally popular, but better if interoperable.
I don't mean that the answer should be "it doesn't," but rather that I
don't actually see why this is valuable, and maybe I'm not the only one
who needs to hear more of a sales pitch.
there's code that implements this. there are people using it. there will
be more of both. a standard will mean greater interoperability.
--
P Vixie
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
