[added DOH WG to the cc:] On 04/04/2018 04:39, Dave Lawrence wrote > I think that's right. -05 with the original_transport optional > parameter accommodates the aims of that other draft.
but ignores the concerns I raised yesterday that simply indicating "tcp" or "udp" is insufficient to allow a server to make policy decisions based on the meta-properties of the original request and its transport (whether that be a "real" tranport protocol like UDP or TCP or a pseudo-transport like DNS-o-TLS, or DNS-o-QUIC, etc). Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
