On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 11:27 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > Martin: Are you saying that you want DOH to remove the optional parameter > from the application/dns-udpwireformat registration? If so, what do you > propose for the DNSOP WG?
Right now, abandon draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http. But I'll concede that I'm probably missing something. By my current understanding, draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http is indistinguishable from a specific implementation of draft-ietf-doh-dns-over-https. That is, if a DOH server wanted to service all its queries by forwarding requests to a resolver [1], I can't see how that would be disallowed by DOH, and that's exactly what draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-wireformat-http appears to describe. Convince me that this isn't the case (or not, and I'll be in the rough on this). --Martin [1] ...after randomizing the ID. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
