On 22/03/2018 15:12, Dave Crocker wrote: > In the case of SRV, for example, that means that for the core SRV > template specification document: > > 1. The first-level, _Proto name assignment text has to be updated > to use the new, Attrleaf global table. > > 2. The second-level _Service name assignment text can remain > unchanged, per RFC 6335. > > Point #2 is actually not 'special' at all. I'd entirely missed that the > very strong need to do the first-level fixup did not also require > messing with the existing second-level.
That's the conversation I thought we'd had in Orlando :p Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
