On 22/03/2018 15:12, Dave Crocker wrote:

> In the case of SRV, for example, that means that for the core SRV
> template specification document:
> 
>      1. The first-level, _Proto name assignment text has to be updated
> to use the new, Attrleaf global table.
> 
>      2. The second-level _Service name assignment text can remain
> unchanged, per RFC 6335.
> 
> Point #2 is actually not 'special' at all.  I'd entirely missed that the
> very strong need to do the first-level fixup did not also require
> messing with the existing second-level.

That's the conversation I thought we'd had in Orlando :p

Ray

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to