On 21/03/2018 15:14, John R. Levine wrote: > The proposal changes the spec for naming SRV records, by replacing the > existing service name registry with a new, different one, and vastly > shrinking the list of known names. To me, that is nuts. It will > retroactively make an unknown set of existing SRV records non-standard.
I'm with John on this one. I recall discussing attrlea fwith Dave way back at the Orlando IETF. I argued then that we need a top level registry for the likes of _tcp, _udp, _dmarc, etc, but I see absolutely no need for a new shrunken registry to replace the port and services registry already used for SRV. By all means define a second level registry for those two-level underscore labels that aren't used for SRV, though. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
