AFAICT, the only change that is being made to existing specs is to provide that, if new keywords are used/added, they should probably be registered too.
The proposal changes the spec for naming SRV records, by replacing the existing service name registry with a new, different one, and vastly shrinking the list of known names. To me, that is nuts. It will retroactively make an unknown set of existing SRV records non-standard.
The part about adding new names as they are defined is fine. Rewriting history is not.
Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
