Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 03:56:22AM +0100, > Martin Hoffmann <mar...@opennetlabs.com> wrote > a message of 38 lines which said: > > > > The current definition is restrictive: it mentions only name > > > servers. > > > > > > IMHO, "in-bailiwick" could be said for any domain name, even if > > > it has less practical consequences than for name servers. For > > > instance, www.toto.fr is in-bailiwick for .fr. > > > > So a domain name would be in-bailiwick with regards to a given zone > > if it is part of that zone or any of its child zones? > > Yes.
In that case, perhaps we can use a definition along these lines? At least to me it seems intuitively clear whereas with the current definition I had to think for a bit to make sense of it. Except that "child zone" should probably be "subordinate zones" or something similar to also include (great)*grandchildren. Kind regards, Martin _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
