The text for "in-bailwick" is too restrictive, it doesn’t just cover NS records or glue records.
In-bailwick refers to records that in the normal course of DNS resolution would have been requested of by the server the current response is from. e.g. if you are querying a .com server then all records in the response that end with .com are in-bailwick. Mark > On 5 Dec 2017, at 5:27 am, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: > > Greetings again. > > Some of the new terms added to the terminology-bis draft > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/)since RFC > 7719 can be a bit tricky. This week, we hope you will look at the definitions > in the draft for: > - In-bailiwick > - Out-of-bailiwick > - In-domain > - Sibling domain > Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the > definitions should change. > > --Paul Hoffman > > [[ As a reminder, we asked the following last week, but got no reply: For the > past many versions of the terminology-bis draft > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/), Section > 2 has definitions of "Global DNS" and "Private DNS", based on the facets > listed in "Naming system". This was discussed heavily on the list earlier, > but it is also a pretty big change, so we want to be sure that it is what the > WG wants. Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the > definitions should change. ]] > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
