yes. this is good.

-G

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:30 PM,  <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Adding a example as a text is a little complicated.
>
> Adding examples as a table is good ? or too large ?
>
> Delegation  | Parent | Name Server Name   | Type
>             | Zone   |                    |
> ------------+--------+--------------------+------------------------------
> com         | .      | a.gtld-servers.net | in-bailiwick / sibling domain
> net         | .      | a.gtld-servers.net | in-bailiwick / in-domain
> example.org | org    | ns.example.org     | in-bailiwick / in-domain
> example.org | org    | ns.ietf.org        | in-bailiwick / sibling domain
> example.org | org    | ns.example.com     | out-of-bailiwick
> example.jp  | jp     | ns.example.jp      | in-bailiwick / in-domain
> example.jp  | jp     | ns.example.ne.jp   | in-bailiwick / sibling domain
> example.jp  | jp     | ns.example.com     | out-of-bailiwick
>
> --
> Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp>
>
>> From: George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org>
>> feels like a concrete example in a.b.c.example.com terms would help
>> define both in-baliwick, and out-of-baliwick, for the cases.
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:42 PM,  <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote:
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> terminology-bis-08:
>>> | In-bailiwick: An adjective to describe a name server whose name is
>>> |    either subordinate to or (rarely) the same as the zone origin.
>>>
>>> Ok, In-bailwick in terminology-bis-08 may be restrictive because "the
>>> zone origin" is unclear. I intended that "the zone origin" is the zone
>>> origin of parent zone. The sentence needs more words.
>>>
>>> NEW
>>>
>>>   In-bailiwick: An adjective to describe a name server whose name is
>>>        either subordinate to or (rarely) the same as the origin
>>>        of the zone that contains the delegation to the name server.
>>>
>>> ... bad english text ... please fix.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp>
>>>
>>>> From: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org>
>>>> The text for "in-bailwick" is too restrictive, it doesn’t just cover NS 
>>>> records or
>>>> glue records.
>>>>
>>>> In-bailwick refers to records that in the normal course of DNS resolution
>>>> would have been requested of by the server the current response is from.
>>>> e.g. if you are querying a .com server then all records in the response 
>>>> that end
>>>> with .com are in-bailwick.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 5:27 am, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Some of the new terms added to the terminology-bis draft 
>>>>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/)since 
>>>>> RFC 7719 can be a bit tricky. This week, we hope you will look at the 
>>>>> definitions in the draft for:
>>>>> - In-bailiwick
>>>>> - Out-of-bailiwick
>>>>> - In-domain
>>>>> - Sibling domain
>>>>> Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the 
>>>>> definitions should change.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Paul Hoffman
>>>>>
>>>>> [[ As a reminder, we asked the following last week, but got no reply: For 
>>>>> the past many versions of the terminology-bis draft 
>>>>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/), 
>>>>> Section 2 has definitions of "Global DNS" and "Private DNS", based on the 
>>>>> facets listed in "Naming system". This was discussed heavily on the list 
>>>>> earlier, but it is also a pretty big change, so we want to be sure that 
>>>>> it is what the WG wants. Please review these terms and comment on the 
>>>>> list if you think the definitions should change. ]]
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>>>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>>>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>>

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to