feels like a concrete example in a.b.c.example.com terms would help define both in-baliwick, and out-of-baliwick, for the cases.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:42 PM, <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote: > Thanks. > > terminology-bis-08: > | In-bailiwick: An adjective to describe a name server whose name is > | either subordinate to or (rarely) the same as the zone origin. > > Ok, In-bailwick in terminology-bis-08 may be restrictive because "the > zone origin" is unclear. I intended that "the zone origin" is the zone > origin of parent zone. The sentence needs more words. > > NEW > > In-bailiwick: An adjective to describe a name server whose name is > either subordinate to or (rarely) the same as the origin > of the zone that contains the delegation to the name server. > > ... bad english text ... please fix. > > -- > Kazunori Fujiwara, JPRS <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> > >> From: Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> >> The text for "in-bailwick" is too restrictive, it doesn’t just cover NS >> records or >> glue records. >> >> In-bailwick refers to records that in the normal course of DNS resolution >> would have been requested of by the server the current response is from. >> e.g. if you are querying a .com server then all records in the response that >> end >> with .com are in-bailwick. >> >> Mark >> >>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 5:27 am, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote: >>> >>> Greetings again. >>> >>> Some of the new terms added to the terminology-bis draft >>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/)since >>> RFC 7719 can be a bit tricky. This week, we hope you will look at the >>> definitions in the draft for: >>> - In-bailiwick >>> - Out-of-bailiwick >>> - In-domain >>> - Sibling domain >>> Please review these terms and comment on the list if you think the >>> definitions should change. >>> >>> --Paul Hoffman >>> >>> [[ As a reminder, we asked the following last week, but got no reply: For >>> the past many versions of the terminology-bis draft >>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis/), >>> Section 2 has definitions of "Global DNS" and "Private DNS", based on the >>> facets listed in "Naming system". This was discussed heavily on the list >>> earlier, but it is also a pretty big change, so we want to be sure that it >>> is what the WG wants. Please review these terms and comment on the list if >>> you think the definitions should change. ]] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> DNSOP mailing list >>> DNSOP@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >> -- >> Mark Andrews, ISC >> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia >> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
