> On Feb 6, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Ray Bellis <r...@bellis.me.uk> wrote: > >> For now, let’s keep it relevant to the decision this WG has to make, >> about what to do with .alt and whether it’s important to us to >> accommodate cases like .homenet. So far, it seems that the .homenet case >> is much like “locally-served zones”. > > Yes, that's right, with the caveat that all existing locally served > zones are in the reverse space - there's no forward zones registered (yet).
Could you clarify why that’s relevant? Does it just come down to the assumption that reverse zones are not supposed to have human-visible/human-friendly names? Or is there some other characteristic of how those names are used that’s important here? thanks, Suzanne _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
