Hi, Before this goes any further, I’m not sure an incomplete rehashing of the consensus in another WG is a good use of our time.
For now, let’s keep it relevant to the decision this WG has to make, about what to do with .alt and whether it’s important to us to accommodate cases like .homenet. So far, it seems that the .homenet case is much like “locally-served zones”. thanks, Suzanne > On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Ólafur Gudmundsson <o...@ogud.com> wrote: > > > Ralph, > A WG can come to a consensus on a topic without all information available. > Now go back and see if reality changes consensus. > > Just my .02 cents. > > > Ólafur > > On February 6, 2017 9:52:53 AM CST, Ralph Droms <rdroms.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Feb 6, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ólafur Gudmundsson <o...@ogud.com > <mailto:o...@ogud.com>> wrote: > >> Ted, >> >> What RFC are you referring to? >> >> Why do you think .ARPA is for services? >> It's for infrastructure and homenet wants to join the infrastructure. >> >> It is waste of time arguing if name A or B is better take the one you can >> get faster. > > The WG has considered the alternatives, and WG consensus is to specify > ".homenet" > > - Ralph > >> >> Ólafur >> >> >> On February 5, 2017 10:22:35 PM CST, Ted Lemon <mel...@fugue.com >> <mailto:mel...@fugue.com>> wrote: >> The working group has consensus to give it a try. We may change our minds >> of it takes too long, but it seems worth exploring from a process >> perspective anyway. >> >> On Feb 5, 2017 11:18 PM, "John R Levine" <jo...@taugh.com >> <mailto:jo...@taugh.com>> wrote: >> I'm pretty sure I've explained it enough times on this mailing list and in >> the relevant documents by now. If you don't agree, maybe we should just >> accept that. If you don't remember the explanation, it's in the homenet >> naming architecture doc I wrote. >> >> Well, OK, I took another look, and from what I can see, it's a belief that >> people will find toaster.homenet.arpa harder or more confusing to type than >> toaster.homenet. >> >> Just out of curiosity, how long is it worth waiting to get .homenet rather >> than .homenet.arpa? If it took five more years, which at the current rate >> seems optimistic, would homenet still be relevant? >> >> R's, >> John >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org <mailto:DNSOP@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop> > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
