On 06/02/2017 16:12, Suzanne Woolf wrote: > Hi, > > Before this goes any further, I’m not sure an incomplete rehashing of > the consensus in another WG is a good use of our time.
+1 :) > For now, let’s keep it relevant to the decision this WG has to make, > about what to do with .alt and whether it’s important to us to > accommodate cases like .homenet. So far, it seems that the .homenet case > is much like “locally-served zones”. Yes, that's right, with the caveat that all existing locally served zones are in the reverse space - there's no forward zones registered (yet). Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
