On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:08:54AM +0900, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote a message of 41 lines which said:
> > 2) It will make debugging more difficult. With your two-caches > > system, "dig @myresolver NS foobar.example" will retrieve the data > > in foobar.example, while the resolver will use, when iterating, > > the data from .example, which is not showed and I don't see a > > standard way to retrieve it from the "delegation cache". > > - The simplest mode for the client is recursive, since in this mode > the name server acts in the role of a resolver and returns either > an error or the answer, but never referrals. (RFC 1034 Section > 4.3.1) > > "dig @myresolver NS foobar.example" returns authoritative data. Sorry, but I do not see how your answer addresses my concern. (I was talking of debugging, not normal use.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
