On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 03:10:18PM +0900, fujiw...@jprs.co.jp <fujiw...@jprs.co.jp> wrote a message of 61 lines which said:
> I submitted draft-fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update-00 that tries to > improve resolver algorithm. I see the point but I have two practical reservations: 1) Having two separate caches may be a big change for some implementations. 2) It will make debugging more difficult. With your two-caches system, "dig @myresolver NS foobar.example" will retrieve the data in foobar.example, while the resolver will use, when iterating, the data from .example, which is not showed and I don't see a standard way to retrieve it from the "delegation cache". Apart from that, one detail: section 6 on implementations is too short. You should expand it at least with the name of the implementations (you mention two in your OARC talk, so it is not a secret), and may be with RFC 7942 boilerplate. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
