----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <bortzme...@nic.fr> > To: "Ondřej Surý" <ondrej.s...@nic.cz> > Cc: "Bob Harold" <rharo...@umich.edu>, "dnsop" <dnsop@ietf.org> > Sent: Tuesday, 15 November, 2016 01:55:50 > Subject: Re: draft-fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update-00
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 08:46:55PM +0100, > Ondřej Surý <ondrej.s...@nic.cz> wrote > a message of 32 lines which said: > >> > There seems to be an assumption in this draft that the parent NS >> > records are always correct, but I would argue that this is not the >> > case. >> >> Nope, I don't think this is an assumption of this draft > > Yes, it is. Otherwise, what would be the point of using the NS in the > parent instead of the authoritative one? Let me rephrase it, the assumption here is that parent NS are: "as good as they get to resolve the names underneath", and that doesn't mean they are necessarily more or less "correct" than child NS. Cheers, -- Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow -------------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratoře CZ.NIC Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.s...@nic.cz https://nic.cz/ -------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
