On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:58:43AM +0900, Ted Lemon wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:13 PM, bert hubert <bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl> > wrote: > Bert Huber wrote: > > Also, should we work with companies attempting to hinder progress by > > clinging to patents which are no longer enforceable? > > Hm. First, I tend to agree with you that the IETF should not work > with companies that attempt to hinder progress by asserting patents. > I am disappointed, however, that you would suggest that Nominum is > such a company. We've been active in the IETF since the company was
Ted, I should have emailed it to this list as well. I did inform Andreas that I misunderstood the origin of the IPR notification, which I assumed to be Nominum. I also tweeted about it. https://twitter.com/PowerDNS_Bert/status/797075994079268864 > exact language will be, so don't take this as that text, but our CTO > and CEO have both said that our position should be something to the > effect that if there's a standard developed in the IETF that would be > covered by the patent, we would not assert these rights. That would be great! > We think the performance and security of the DNS are important. > That’s one of the reasons that we implemented measures like this years > ago. We’re supportive of it becoming more recognized in the standards > community at this point. We also appreciate Andreas Gustafsson's > good work at Nominum in developing this technology. Ralf's presence at many community events is also most appreciated. It is good to be visible. So I understand your clarification, and I should not only rectify my tweets but my message here as well. Bert _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
