Mark, On September 28, 2016 at 5:08:05 PM, Mark Andrews (ma...@isc.org) wrote: > I've been telling people that if they need a fake private TLD for their local > network they should use one of those since it is exceedingly unlikely > ever to collide with a real DNS name. Am I right?
No. Just because countries don't get assigned these values it doesn't mean that they can't be assigned by ICANN or the IETF in consultation with ICANN. I believe from both the IETF's and ICANN's perspective, 2-letter labels at the root are reserved to be associated with ISO-3166 2-letter codes. I cannot imagine a plausible scenario in which this policy would change. And who *needs* a fake tld? As far as I can tell almost no one. Can we PLEASE not repeat the arguments made against RFC 1918 space in the domain name world? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using AMPGpg
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
