On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 01:36:21AM +0000, Ted Lemon wrote:
>  it might be worth anticipating whether an NXDOMAIN for class=X should also 
> result in an NXDOMAIN answer for the same name with class Y, where Y != X.  
> 

FWIW, I believe that, according to the matching rules in STD 13,
NXDOMAIN is class-bound.  This is in fact related to the argument
about how the class selector fails to do what we'd have needed it to:
if you ask a name server that serves two different classes for the
same name about that name, it will need to figure out which class you
are asking about before it can start the label-by-label matching.
There is no guarantee that there's an answer in every class for a name
that is in one class.  (If there were, the DNS would be broken today:
the root servers won't give you delegation information about non-IN
classes, as far as I can tell.)

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
a...@anvilwalrusden.com

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to