Ted Lemon <ted.le...@nominum.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:44 PM, 神明達哉
> ><jin...@wide.ad.jp<mailto:jin...@wide.ad.jp>> wrote:
> >> So I wonder: should we as wg keep requiring the SHOULD for the already
> >> cached subdomains or can we loosen the requirement specifically for
> >> that case?
>
> > I've already stated I'm okay with relaxing the SHOULD for the case of
> > already
> > cached subdomains. It looks like Stephane and Paul might still oppose, but
> > this seems to be the easiest way to get consensus.
>
> I would be satisfied with this outcome.
Yes, it seems sensible to me.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
Lundy, Fastnet, Irish Sea: East or northeast 4 or 5, becoming variable 3 or 4
in Irish Sea. Slight or moderate, becoming rough in southwest Fastnet. Fair.
Moderate or good.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
