> On Nov 3, 2015, at 7:01 PM, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote: > > Alain Durand <alain.dur...@icann.org> wrote: >> >> In the particular case of the communication between the CPE and the ISP >> DNS recursive resolver, the two parties are within the same administrative >> authority. Thus, the need to make a BCP is much lower. This can be seen >> as simply an implementation issue. > > But there needs to be a specification for interop between the CPE and the > ISP's network, so the ISP knows which suppliers they can buy equipment from.
Exactly. This is specified in each of the various IPv4aas docs, as I pointed out earlier, along with the other things the CPE and the device on the ISP side must agree to do, such as packet format, address/port syntax, etc... Alain _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
