On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:23:22AM -0700, Paul Vixie wrote: > why do you call a section a "set"?
I didn't mean to say that it _is_ one. I meant that nowhere is this particularly clear, and there is a natural sense in which they are sets because they hang together in some way relevant to what was asked. (This is the general reason why data from the additional section can't be promoted to be used as answers, for example.) So if people want it to be clear that RRsets are sets but message sections are not sets, it would be a responsible thing to write that down. That's all I'm trying to say. I think we agree about this (since that's what you also said). A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
