Hi G,

> How specific is the ordering dependency by resolver code variant? by
> version?
> 
> If this becomes a candidate for typing specific resolvers, its useful
> knowledge

It varies quite a bit with the few I looked at, see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wdopuAP2ddLlQcdtX-iAWdUULZ8
for the ones we surveyed.

    So an (A foo?) query greeted with an (A bar=1, CNAME foo=bar, A
    bar=2) reply would have 4.3BSD, glibc, and dietlibc think foo was 2,
    uclibc would see 1 and 2 in the next reply, and Go sees 1 and 2 now.

Cheers, Ralph.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to