Suresh Krishnaswamy wrote: >> ... > > I suspect that it may also have to do, in part, with how the stub resolver > performs its bailiwick checks. A cname target may be out of bailiwick if the > alias has not come into view yet. Expecting the cname to precede the target > could be an implementation short-cut (not saying anything about whether it is > right or wrong).
i've written plenty of code, some of which you are all running in your smart phones, that has an expectation of ordering of rrsets within a section. "added" really does just mean "added" not "inserted". -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
