On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:30:03PM +0200, Warren Kumari wrote: > We shouldn't be figuring out how useful a WG is by the number of > documents published, but I don't think DNSOP is still where documents > go to die...
Agreed, but I also don't want to return to that bleak past where we could never get anything published because it wasn't perfect, and then the number of recycles got high enough that nobody would review, so the draft wasn't perfect, and so on. The editors will put their heads together once more on the basis of the most recent comments. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
