Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote:
>
> This is still contentious, and I think it really should be deferred to the
> -bis document for longer discussion and hopefully consensus.

As far as I can tell from the last few months there is a fairly clear
consensus that the current draft is not good enough. Brushing off
suggestions by saying that we'll publish a turkey then fix it up later is
not a good way to encourage people to contribute.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <d...@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Southeast Fitzroy: Northerly 5 to 7. Moderate, occasionally rough in south.
Fair. Good.

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to