On 7/16/15 6:44 AM, Warren Kumari wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:30:03PM +0200, Warren Kumari wrote: >>> We shouldn't be figuring out how useful a WG is by the number of >>> documents published, but I don't think DNSOP is still where documents >>> go to die... >> >> Agreed, but I also don't want to return to that bleak past where we >> could never get anything published because it wasn't perfect, and then >> the number of recycles got high enough that nobody would review, so >> the draft wasn't perfect, and so on.
good enough is a substantiallly different bar then good. If there are things that folks really cannot live with I think that's really what I want to know about. > +very many much lots. > > I just wanted to acknowledge the fact that our chairs are now getting > documents pushed through.... > > W > >> The editors will put their heads >> together once more on the basis of the most recent comments. >> >> A >> >> -- >> Andrew Sullivan >> a...@anvilwalrusden.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list >> DNSOP@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
