On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> wrote: > All, > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:33:59 -0400 > Andrew Sullivan <a...@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 03:43:12PM -0400, Casey Deccio wrote: >> > I am also concerned about the apparent urgency to get the initial document >> > out with points that admittedly remain contentious and/or where there isn't >> > WG consensus. I don't think it needs perfection, but it seems unnecessary >> > to get the document published without further explicitly identifying and >> > considering the standing issues. We've haven't had this document >> > before--I'm not sure what the rush is now. >> >> Just on this issue, and speaking only for myself (but as one of the >> people behind this document), my view is that this WG has historically >> been one of the places where documents go to die, and I am unwilling >> to go through the exercise of proving again how great an enemy of the >> good the perfect can be. I'd be much more inclined to remove the >> contentious definitions and publish that document than to try to get >> things perfect. > > I totally agree, on all counts.
+1 on getting it published. I should point out that the emphasis should be on the "historically" in "WG has historically been one of the places where documents go to die". Recently this working group has been munching though and getting documents published. 2012: 1 RFC 2013: 1 RFC 2014: 1 RFC 2015: 3 RFC, 4 documents are with the IESG / RFC Ed. We shouldn't be figuring out how useful a WG is by the number of documents published, but I don't think DNSOP is still where documents go to die... W > > Cheers, > > -- > Shane > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
