Andrew, On Dec 5, 2013, at 7:13 AM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > The difficulty is in the claim that these names are already "out > there". If that is in fact true -- that these are names that are > being handed around and potentially will get into protocol slots -- > then as a matter of prudence we should put all the strings in the > special-use registry, and treat them all as .invalid is.
What criteria do you propose the IESG should use? Regards, -drc
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
