On 5 dec 2013, at 16:02, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > Convincing all existing users (e.g .local) to move under the new labor (e.g > local.alt) is probably a non-starter, but perhaps things like .bit, and new > things may do so… > One of the things that we repeatedly heard during the "namespace collisions" > debacle was that folk would like a "safe" place where they could put > non-Interent DNS things. This seems related… > > Things under .alt are not real delegations and are not guaranteed to be > unique. There is no registry here (in the same way that .onion was not > guaranteed to be unique
Agree. I also think "machine-readable things" that can be reconfigured is easier to change than "naming conventions" that humans use. That kind of "already deployed" things are problematic. Patrik
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
