On Feb 17, 2013, at 10:22 AM, "Livingood, Jason" <jason_living...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> Based on feedback yesterday on the list, I did a quick –04 update, which is > now at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-livingood-negative-trust-anchors/. > > > The are seven open issues documented at the end of the I-D. But the most > important questions for this WG are: > 1 – Is this worth consideration as a WG I-D or should it continue only as an > individual I-D? > 2 – If the answer to #1 is that it should be a WG I-D, would you like a brief > discussion of the open issues at IETF 86? Yes please, to both. W > > Thanks! > Jason > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- It's a mistake trying to cheer up camels. You might as well drop meringues into a black hole. -- Terry Prachett _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
