On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2012-10-10, at 08:23, "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wma...@ottix.net> wrote:
Please review draft-andrews-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303
I've read this draft and would support it, in lieu of the omniscient-
darft should that not proceed any further.
I don't understand the logic in the sentence above.
That my young friend is called a senior moment! :)
(I expect that if omniscient-
went through then the registry in 6303 would become deprecated or adapted
for another purpose not yet foreseen.)
I don't expect that would happen.
I think it's sensible to specify both that (a) these zones should be
served locally, and (b) because we expect not everybody to follow that
advice, for corresponding queries to be soaked up in AS112-like
infrastructure.
+1
wfms
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
