On 2012-10-10, at 08:23, "William F. Maton Sotomayor" <wma...@ottix.net> wrote:
> >> Please review draft-andrews-dnsop-rfc6598-rfc6303 > > I've read this draft and would support it, in lieu of the omniscient- > darft should that not proceed any further. I don't understand the logic in the sentence above. > (I expect that if omniscient- > went through then the registry in 6303 would become deprecated or adapted > for another purpose not yet foreseen.) I don't expect that would happen. I think it's sensible to specify both that (a) these zones should be served locally, and (b) because we expect not everybody to follow that advice, for corresponding queries to be soaked up in AS112-like infrastructure. Joe
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
