The real answer Tony is coming out of left field and it is the legal
claims being asserted against people intentionally fielding code they
know is broken and for which they refused to accept criticism's about
that code (oddly enough from people like Dean and I and a number of others.
The real fun part is the legal liability this is creating for people who
in this list claim they have a right to ignore whatever they want, and
its coming...
So the real issue is whether there is a class action matter coming
against the ISC and a number of the projects it operates per this new
accountability push.
This is NOT good for any of these projects so I suggest that the proper
response is a new level of transparency in who is making what decisions
for the WG and how they are made regarding design testing and otherwise.
Just my two cents as a civilian.
Todd Glasssey
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Roll Over and Die ?
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:35:59 +0000
From: Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at>
To: George Barwood <george.barw...@blueyonder.co.uk>
CC: dnsop@ietf.org
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, George Barwood wrote:
Any reaction to this CircleID article ?
http://www.circleid.com/posts/dns_resolvers_and_dnssec_roll_over_and_die/
https://www.isc.org/announcement/response-to-concerns10Feb
http://unbound.net/pipermail/unbound-users/2010-February/001031.html
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch<d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2694 - Release Date: 02/17/10
22:30:00
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
