On Jan 21, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
>>
>> I understand EKR's remark (thanks) in addition to the improvement Scott
>> suggested there is the argument that if a rollover remains a special
>> event it is bound to go wrong, while if it is part of regular
>> operational procedure the operators do not have to go through the
>> learning curve. That argument works, but not in the case that EKR
>> brought up, if _the_ operator gets sacked the rollover done by the new
>> one is the first one that new operator does, she wouldn't have the
>> benefit of operational routine.
>
> Operational routines like this will be automated.
That is what I would hope. But documents like this do suggest the defaults and
EKRs arguments for 'ad-hoc' rolling or the other comments for regular rolling
do impact the market that provides the automation.
-- Olaf
(Full disclosure: NLnet Labs is part of a group that develops this sort of
software, opendnssec).
________________________________________________________
Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs
Science Park 140,
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/ 1098 XG Amsterdam
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
