On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Olaf Kolkman wrote: > > I understand EKR's remark (thanks) in addition to the improvement Scott > suggested there is the argument that if a rollover remains a special > event it is bound to go wrong, while if it is part of regular > operational procedure the operators do not have to go through the > learning curve. That argument works, but not in the case that EKR > brought up, if _the_ operator gets sacked the rollover done by the new > one is the first one that new operator does, she wouldn't have the > benefit of operational routine.
Operational routines like this will be automated. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
