On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22/02/15 13:04, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote: >>> > A good summary. I've read these CGA-TSIG documents and I still do not >>> > understand the problem it solves, and how. A big explanation effort, >> starting >>> > from a problem statement, seems necessary. >> Secure authentication + data encryption >> >> Your suggestion to improve summary is welcomed as I am working on revision. > > Hang on - didn't we set up a mailing list [1] for exactly that > purpose? I.e. to investigate and explain Hosnieh's proposal. > AIUI that wasn't fruitful and the list was closed.
Ah! Yes, I kinda, vaguely remember this -- I followed this list for a very short while, but quickly decided I didn't have time (or interest). It is useful to know that the consensus (after ~250 emails, so it was well discussed) was not to pursue this or form a WG. I've just cherry-picked a few emails from the list, and agree with the consensus. > > I hope the dprive chairs will not allow repetition of all of that > discussion here. That's nothing against Hosnieh or her proposal, > but we should not divert this wg with such repetition. Agree. Apologies to Hosnieh, but due to the tight agenda time and the fact that CGA-TSIG has already been discussed (in multiple venues), we will not be able to provide you with discussion time. W > > S. > > > [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secauth/current/maillist.html > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
