On Wednesday, February 18, 2015, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 02:48:25PM -0500, > Warren Kumari <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote > a message of 48 lines which said: > > > We now have 2 primary document sets under consideration: > > What is your assessment of draft-hoffman-dprive-dns-tls-* and > draft-wijngaards-dnsop-confidentialdns? > > Lacking a common set of criteria to choose among the proposals, I can > say that, by my book, they should be considered, too. > Sorry, I should have been more clear - draft-hoffman-dprive-dns-tls-* has been combined with the Verisign document. On the draft-wijngaards-dnsop-confidentialdns front, we hadn't really discussed it much / Wouter hasn't asked for it to be adopted, but you are right - it had completely slipped my mind. (Writing on a phone, will look more when I get home, and also check if they want to persue it. ) W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
