On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 09:22:51PM +0100, Hosnieh Rafiee <[email protected]> wrote a message of 49 lines which said:
> with almost no clear change on DNS protocol. Stop playing with words: if it requires a change in both client and server, it *is* a change in the protocol (even if the DNS part is unmodified, which is, for instance, the case with DNS-over-TLS-on-new-port). If it can be deployed unilaterally by one party, it is not a change in the protocol. I don't see how encryption of DNS traffic could be done without a change in the protocol. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
